Tuesday, June 25, 2013

Street Theatre: Changing the Unjust World by Shamsul Islam



Shamsul Islam, popularly known as Islambhai, is a renowned Street Theatre personality. He is one of the founders of Nishant Natya Manch a street theatre group, which was established way back in 1971. Nishant is known for its quick improvisations and innovations. By now they have performed over half a century street plays. Some of these plays have had over 3000 performances in various parts of the county.
Editor's note published in Health for Millions, Delhi, July-August 1995



Street Theatre: Changing the Unjust World

Shamsul Islam

Let me admit at the outset that for a very long period in seventies we relished the misconception that street theatre (ST) was basically a theatre which would take up issues which belong to the realm of politics only. This confession of mine, however, should not lead anyone to believe that I am trying to alter or shift the thrust of ST as a political movement. ST has always aimed at mobilizing the opinion of common people as a pre-requisite for change. ST is called, agit prop theatre for the very basic reason that it wants its audiences and viewers not to remain silent spectators or neutral to the unjust and repressive life around, but act in a manner that life is made humane and just. This calls for active participation in the struggle for correction, demanding a bit of sacrifice also. That is why ST is a political phenomenon.

The issue I am trying to underline relates to the content format of the ST. Should ST confine itself only to raising issues which concern political aspects like role of politicians, bureaucracy, police or exploitation—foreign as well as domestic? Though issues like gender bias or religious fundamentalism were taken up violating the Lakshman Rekha of the prevalent understanding of the content of ST movement, however, issues concerning environment, health, hygiene and many others like these were dismissed as of no concern. These later issues were looked down upon as something reformist in nature and of no concern to ST activists which were out on roads seeking to change the world.

It was no snobbery on the part of ST activists that they believed like this. It was their genuine belief that economic-political issues form the base and all other issues belonged to super-structure. We should strive to change the base and super-structure will automatically change accordingly. Moreover, ST performances were addressed mainly to the ruling classes and exposed their misdeeds and as a principle did not probe into the weaknesses of the masses. This was the dominant thinking in seventies when ST originated. ST was too nascent and yet to identify with general masses and issues concerning them. The ST activists could not have thought otherwise in the given political situation which prevailed at the end of sixties and the beginning of seventies. It was the failure of democratic-welfare state of India which gave birth to the ST movement. It was quite natural that the ST movement had to be exclusively confronting the same de-generation.

It is an undeniable fact that by mid-sixties the Indian polity had lost much of its legitimacy. The limited positive ideas, convictions and organizations we inherited were on the verge of collapse and had lost their relevance. The immense proportions attained by price rise, un-employment, black-marketing communalism, Casteism and oppression of women finally took its toll when monolithic rule of Congress Party was broken and it got split. In these circumstances when established political institutions and even press became silent spectators and ditched the Indian people and betrayed their aspirations, ST came as a genre espousing the cause of the Indian people and to uphold their honour. This was how ST took up the issues of political corruption, mismanagement, repression and dictatorial tendencies among the rulers, initially.

However, the scenario changed gradually. The ST activists realized very soon that the political issues were not the only ones which had to be taken up for building a just Indian society; but also some of the issues which were treated as on the periphery or as fringe issues. It was through their practical experiences that the ST teams were to realize soon that at the micro level the unjust system remained entrenched. More so because within society there were other issues of crisis than just political, and society could not re-generate unless those issues were also dissected.

Members of Nishant will always remain grateful to the simple but full of warmth, tribal friends of Hazaribagh (Bihar) for making us realize that ST performances have to go beyond political issues if ST is committed to reflect the sorrows and aspirations of common people of India. Our face to face interaction with tribals at Hazaribagh made us realize that new grounds have to be searched and traversed.

I would like to narrate the actual incident which took place in early eighties (1980s). It all began in the tribal belt of Barhi Tehsil of Hazaribagh district. We had highly successful performances which continued beyond midnight, of our political plays for three days in a row. On the fourth day when we were relatively in a bigger village and had finished the performances, a group of tribal women stood up and said that our plays caricaturing and lampooning the politicians, bureaucrats, Sahookars (money-lenders) and Policewallas were great and they had enjoyed the same. However, they were frank enough to tell us that our plays did not take up the issues which were far more serious for them in and around their village. They explained that their drunkard husbands and the absence of any medical facility were two things about which they were worried most. They asked point blank,” do you have plays on these?” We had none. We had always believed that it was none of our tasks. It was sheer reformism. But ground reality in that tribal village convinced us that we were out of touch with reality. It was a total exposure of poverty of philosophy of our kind of ST. We accepted our shortcomings and promised to present next day, two plays on their most burning issues.
 
We honestly realized our fault and took up the challenge. The entire next day was spent rehearsing on the two themes. On drunkard husbands we based our play on a story of well known Oriya writer, who is also known as Premchand of Oriya literature, Fakir Mohan Senapati. The story titled as ‘Patent Medicine’ is full of action and ends with thrashing of drunkard husband with broom by wife thus underlying broom as patent medicine for the drunkard husbands. The play became so popular on the tour that we had to perform it more than once at every place. It became a play with which the tribals identified most. Later on we changed the name of the play to 'Ramban' on the suggestion of a trible woman when we were performing in Udaipur district of Rajasthan. On the issue of lack of health services, we were lucky to have a copy of the book ‘Where There is No Doctor’ with us (this book has always been part of properties of any touring team of Nishant). We took up few aspects from this book and improvised them into scenes. This innovation also became very popular.

Since then Nishant made it a point to have plays on health issues in its repertoire. We developed more plays on personal hygiene, cleanliness, avoiding of over medication, complete treatment for TB and exposing multinational drug companies. In fact, these so called apolitical plays helped us greatly in getting closer and familiar to our audiences. We soon realized that such plays helped us in gaining confidence of the down-trodden and later when we performed political plays the audiences were more receptive. Of course, we did not confine our health plays to the issue of physical health only but roped in the issues of mental health and even social health. We took care that our plays on health should never look like DAVP or Song and Drama Division propaganda. We related all these health issues to the social system which was based on exploitation of men by men. We underline the fact that health issues were essentially related to the nature of society we were living in. Better health would require a just and humane society also. For us, raising of health issues in the ST performances became part of our cultural struggle to change this unjust world.

Of course, the credit for opening this new horizon to us goes to simple tribal women of Hazaribagh. We shall never be able to repay their debt.

[This article also carried two photographs of Nishant’s performances at Laxmi Bai College (University of Delhi) and in Tehri, Garhwal which are not reproduced here.]